evidencebasedradiology.net
EBR home
EBR overview
The EBR process
Ask - an answerable question
Search - For the Best Current Evidence
 
 
 
 
Appraise - Using Standardised Methods
Apply - Conclusions to Patients
Evaluate - Self Evaluation
Ongoing EBR - Getting Research into Practice
Ongoing EBR - Teaching materials

Search - For the Best Current Evidence

 

Overview - Interventional Questions

The types of questions we ask about interventional radiology procedures are similar to those surgeons and physicians ask (sometimes about the same procedures!). We can, therefore, make use of the evidence pyramid.

Search Engines

Secondary Literature: A useful, free, starting point is a search engine that is designed with issues of evidence quality in mind. This is SUMSearch. Search term entry follows PubMed principles (and you will get some helpful hints before your search starts). The results will be returned in a ‘league table’ of evidence categories. It can be a very useful ‘filtered’ resource to give quick access to ‘best current evidence’. It includes the Cochrane database in its search.

Primary Literature: These search engines can be classified as ‘raw’ or ‘filtered’, ‘free’ or ‘subscription-based.’ PubMed is an example of a free site, largely used for ‘raw’ searching. This is analogous to older computing interfaces such as DOS. It is very powerful, but getting good results is dependent on a high level of operator skill. Ovid have produced and excellent search engine that is accessed by subscription. It is (with a little training) easier to use than PubMed and results are very comprehensive. The ‘filtered’ type of search is analogous to newer computing interfaces such as Windows. The program designers have done a lot of the work for you and users with little experience can get decent results when looking for current evidence. Examples of this are the Clinical Queries section of PubMed (free) and the Knowledge Finder (subscription) site. Knowledge Finder is definitely worth a look if you are getting too much irrelevant material on your PubMed searches. Its designers have applied fuzzy logic, concept mapping, ‘up-front’ limits and author search options with an option for listing of retrieved articles by relevance. It is the kind of site that most practicing radiologists will find much more satisfactory for use than PubMed. The drawback is that some constraints are placed on the overall power of the search by this type of system.

The APPRAISE section of this site describes the hierarchy of evidence within individual retrievals are ranked.

When to use which search engine?

If seeking a comprehensive interventional literature review, we will usually try SUMSearch, Knowledge Finder and Clinical Queries for a spectrum of papers (with MeSH terms) and then use this information to build a PICO question (see the ASK section of this site) for use in PubMed or OVID.

You can also search the higher levels of the Evidence Pyramid by going to one of the sites listed in the introductory information above (e.g Evidence Based Medicine, Clinical Evidence). The sites are not geared towards Interventional Radiology.

   
  EBR  
© 2002 evidencebasedradiology.net